Theorem isarep2 6638

Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature "[ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 6635. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isarep2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
isarep2.2	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isarep2	⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑤   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem isarep2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resima 6013	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
2		resopab 6032	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
3	2	imaeq1i 6054	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
4	1, 3	eqtr3i 2757	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
5		funopab 6582	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
6		isarep2.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
7	6	rspec 3242	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8		nfv 1910	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
9	8	mo3 2553	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃*𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
10	7, 9	sylibr 233	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑)
11		moanimv 2610	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑))
12	10, 11	mpbir 230	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
13	5, 12	mpgbir 1794	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
14		isarep2.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15	14	funimaex 6635	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
16	13, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
17	4, 16	eqeltri 2824	. 2 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
18	17	isseti 3485	1 ⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1532   = wceq 1534  ∃wex 1774  [wsb 2060   ∈ wcel 2099  ∃*wmo 2527  ∀wral 3056  Vcvv 3469  {copab 5204   ↾ cres 5674   “ cima 5675  Fun wfun 6536

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2164  ax-ext 2698  ax-rep 5279  ax-sep 5293  ax-nul 5300  ax-pr 5423

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-mo 2529  df-eu 2558  df-clab 2705  df-cleq 2719  df-clel 2805  df-nfc 2880  df-ral 3057  df-rex 3066  df-rab 3428  df-v 3471  df-dif 3947  df-un 3949  df-in 3951  df-ss 3961  df-nul 4319  df-if 4525  df-sn 4625  df-pr 4627  df-op 4631  df-br 5143  df-opab 5205  df-id 5570  df-xp 5678  df-rel 5679  df-cnv 5680  df-co 5681  df-dm 5682  df-rn 5683  df-res 5684  df-ima 5685  df-fun 6544

This theorem is referenced by: (None)